why Clarck silent until he did retire?

It is a regionable debate between cricket scholars that Mykal Clarck 'Pupp' might have thought of it, before he retired all along, that what did he face during his captaincy, as there are lot of matter to dwell upon, from the beginning of his career as a captain for Australian team to the final days including victory at home soil at the 2015 cricket world cup itself- however we find out that Mykal Clarck was still asked to be keep quiet or he was quiet on his own acords, however the creativity of a cricket scholar like Mykal Clarck speaks a lot about the decision about the retirement of the former wicket keeper Bred Hedden, who was forced to do that by the Australian cricket board, by deciding to replace him as soon as possible to the feelings he faced with giving refuge or relaxations to the family of Philip Hughes as well, which put him in his sorrow and misery for his team too. The issue the most cricket scholars are debating that if Clarck would have really been thwarded by the cricket board of Australia, he could be like Watson or Maxwell, who both refused to take orders pressurising on them by the board in the foreign tours, but what make the experts most worried is that if Clarck was worried for his team mates, or he knew what is going to happen to his team mates, he surely had been misjudged on his own acount to find out, that how much dammage his team mates faced during his captaincy and in the late time during the contest reopened for the captaincy, once Clarck semed to be deeply injured before the end of his glorious cricket himself precisely working all alone for the good and glory for the Australian team at the international circuit of cricket itself. Now, what the major question is that did Mykal Clarck wish to remain silent on his own accord? as far the facts are concerned, the Australian cricket press is so powerful and it has almost always effected the game plan of the board from Ricky Ponting's decisiveness in the rising t twenty format to the late disturbance in the form of bowling decisions, from the raising block to the rising bowling stars like Bred Williams to late twickling cricketer like Andy Wickle, these all have been precisely effected by the power of the press of the cricket board in Australia itself, thus the trouble is that is this the time when even after retirement Clark is wishing to take the chances and as the Australian cricket press holds precise position in decision making of Australian cricket team, it might be a direct question for them to think before their future decision at any format, or did Clarck really face such troubles and problems, which he thought to solve single handed and thus he was thwarded there? In this questioning position of the time and space in the complex politics of Australian cricket, what we can finally think that the ways in which Australian cricket stars like Shane Watson and Johnson like bowlers has suddenly take retirement from Test cricket, it indicates that the counter resistence on the Australian board has been flopped into existence and thus far Mykal Clarck has to take caution whenever he would be discussing the troubles Australia face during his captaincy, even he is thinking about his past through his writing in his own book itself, so we hope that 'pupp' wil take care of his own identity and great representation because it would be cleare to him from all shore that cricket doesn't end at the face of retirement from playing it only...