Greatness of mesopotamian civilisation

It's easy to understand that the civilisation was great because Mesopotamia is most ancient civilisation, however it's shift from authority to savagery make the whole proof that what kind of shift the historians might expect, however the agrarian disparities and viral vulnerabilities of Salgon the great are being treated in the foundation stone, but the most complicated stage to understand Mesopotamia to understand the shift of transfer in culture. in the ways in which the Mesopotamians gradually shifted from least expected tribal groups to the most complicated complex organised community is often debated, for this historians like Shalif Hussein and Sharda Panekar use the term 'temple making of mesopotamian urbanisation', this theory refers the ultimate shift of urbanisation either through force by regional commanders or through the expulse of internal trade which was related to the temples made in 'x' and 'u' forms in Mesopotamia. another set of the historians including James Nevolski and Paul macrine believes that Mesopotamian civilisation was the brief example of collapse settlement and stratification, which means that it was millitarystic in all forms, but the shift of form demands to the ways in their creation of the buildings and mappings including 'kin islands' and 'nasurdalzar' and 'moslaq' these all forms suggests that the evidence founds in these places are clear view of the potency that social shift helped in the random greatness of mesopotamian civilisation. in the both accounts, what we can finally judge that the copper pans, niddle ores lesthenes, cups of silver brass, scales of bevel rim bowls in all forms help us to understand that the cultural shift was ultimate source of the greatness of Mesopotamian civilisation in all forms, which finally helped it to be called 'great' not because it had final roots of the beginning, but it had accomplished it's beginning to be the social structures in the most ancient dynamics.