aura authority and americans

The United States has gone through several deficiencies, credits and interfaces since it has become the world power after the downfall of the Soviet union, however it has been blown out by it's hiddden counter-parts including China, Combodia, North Korea, Cuba and Vietnam as well, in this course of the time, American authorities has discussed their chances, role and demonstrate their own wages to exclude certain asspects from the political authority as well, but it continue to hold on to it's aura itself. However, Americans are living in the suspect of being reporting to help the Islamic State under the war going on in Syria now, because the historic facts are not in their support as it is believed by some communicative agencies that Bashad Al Asad has been wished to be thwarded by the Americans due to the capacity of the past and his father was wished to be done the same, Americans wished this politics to remain at the possible mechanism itself- in such way what we shall have to understand is that whether Americans expecting that they will loss their own reputation in the world is something- however in this face of time, was there any global reputation americans have in the past? that's the identity question for itself- when we say that Americans have dominations, we forget to remember that America has never been it's own self and it's emmigrent citizens has never wished for it's own identity itself- However in the face of the development of the politics and identity, second of all, we shall have to remember that the power the American politicians have at present in two zones includng NATO and CENTO itself at both shores itself. The point is that when we are saying that United States has been involved to distress Syria in the war and is trying to dimulge the political government in Syria, we shall have to think out that Americans always like to react late, the world wars and the gulf war is the eye witness, why shall it wish to act on the first note itself? in the same way, we shall have to understand that when they are saying that Americans hadn't been able to captive the islamic state's leader Bagdadi and helped in the formation of the new terror in the world, it doesn't mean that America is a nation that supports terror forever, otherwise it has released all it's prison and it won't be whirling with it's possible wish to give security to the world. What is the fact is that we are not expecting to have the 3rd world war, we know that even the United States hasn't been hegemonic in last few years, it has tried to support actual demonstration of balance of power, it is no dout that what's going on in the nearby teritories of Syria from Turk's distruction of Russian plane and Russian distruction of the Saudi Arab's navy post submarine, this all have to be understood in the face of the equal balance of power, rather than thinking in the mode of distruction, otherwise this realist approach which only talks about the power and distructio will destroy the whole world itself, as this time not only Americans will be responsible but the Asiatic teritories and so it will be responsible from the Russian side itself for the equal existence of distruction itself...

prefering special schools rather than inclusive schools is not a good sake- how?

it was believed by Nehru jee that education is must for the children with physicaly chalenged quota, however acording to the article 23 of the indian Penal code act, it was up to the government either to set up the possible schools that shall be known as 'special schools' or it is up to the parens or gardians of the children to send them with normal tallent to the inclusive school. This concept of the inclusive education however was brought into particular prominence after the P W D act (1995) was brought into proper shape. in 2007, finally after the R N I act into progress, the inclusive education was allowed to the people. now, coming to the statre and competitivness, we have seen great people, who are not exceptions in our communityso it is first of all essential for people to send their children to normal schools and provide them inclusive education 1. the availibilty of the dependence and backwardness of people or the unawareness of the normal norms for the children doesn't allow the students to go into the inclusive school. 2. the children are forced either due to the economic and social norms to folllow the old tendencies and not lead to the proper functionality. 3. at large,the children are not easily adaptable to the situations, but as far the struggles of adolscence and learning are concerned, we have to face equal struggle around the core in special schools, so what's the benifit of it? 4. there might be a possibility that the children are supposed to not leave the culture of sympathy and suspicion thus their education is not being provided inclusive at all. In this all mess of social deflation and discursion, we find out that the inclusive education is being blocked up by the social institutes, thus what is the weakness of the special school that they make their own self separate culture, which make us loose the existence of equal cultural possession when we come in connection with the inclusive culture and in this form, it is necessary to give student inclusive education, apart from this the students might not face the troubles to stand up to their parents expectations when they come to inclusive environmen so we shall have inclusive education- this dualism will finally help us to be the proper citizens of India itself, even we are visually challenged for the sake of it...

why criticise Modi for everything?

When i generally talk to people about why Rahul Gandhi jee always target mModi or his tasks or his foreign visits or even his strong menifesto for the poor and poverty or giv statement like 'no farmer is being look after by Modi sarkar', i certainly found a simplest term used by my friends that Rahul suppose Modi to be bad wicked even worse for indian politics, but i have made it a guess for myself now and I think in some certain ways now, my guess may be on the right money though. I simply reply to them-na na, not only bad, they are worried. do you listen what statement congress people give in press when modi visits foreign places, what statemen they give when modi launches any new yojna? in short they are worried that a new model will establish, you might know or not, nehruian model of foreign policy, development and social distribution economy are three pillars of congress politics which are never even challenged in past, but they have now realised that mahatma Gandhi was enrolled with Nehru in the foundation of india and so in the order of the theorums later applied by Nehru, thus they are worried that modi might take a chance because he understand them so he might be able to form a better new model for india itself.. Now, what my point is that it's not the symbol of monetary policy, economic hoardness and default fragmentation, we all have got enough issues to contradict any government, that is ruling present India itself, whether from right to expression to right to performativity of social classes or ethnic environment in the lower class areas to the backwardness rights of the tribal unions not being focused under the privatisation through foreign development agenda itself- what we shall have to understand is that when two parties are facing each other under approach of recreation of reformativ standerds, we shall finally have to decide that we won't support ill-effictively to those parties who are willing to take vote under pretences of political misbehaviour, rather we shall have to be rational enough to justify which way is right. In the commencement of the politics spreading away in our nation, we shall see much more tough days, because the challenges of new standers can hit the core, but be careful not to be bamboozled by political statements and I want to say to supporters of other parties that you can use Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha for your discussions and demonstrate your strengths there rather than politicalising the formost public stage and i shall say to congress that your party-chosen people have ruuled india as Prime minister even for two terms, please let mr. Modi atleast rule 5 years of commencement, then you can say whatever you want but don't creat insurgency at home...

why russia wish to held responsibility to wash out terrorism?

It is not far than 2 decade ago, when Soviet Russia collapsed under the burdon of unblemished denouncement from it's European counter-parts, it's corspondence to the eastern world seemed to be broken and it had been settled to face the disturbance by the trade unions, which all set in the dramatic shift of crisis and thus Soviet Union was dispatched from it's hinges in the cores of the international politics itself forever. However, Russia has promised itself to build a powerful nation-state through it's communist delicacy, one thing that has been promised by it's own nature was to continue the growth of the communism, even it's own hinges were blasted by it's own disparities, however the range of the calamity were felt by the other communist nations, but they didn't blaim for the outer effect of the communist dispairity at the time itself, which led to a counter-insurgency in such nation states later on. Now, when the soviet union was disturbed at it's core, Russia had witnessed that communism was also blaimed by the capitalist powers as being diluted the fame of the political authority, specific to the response of the gurilla terror it had provoked in Cuba, the ways in which North Korea is going to respond and as well as the ways in which the central European nations were not still accepting the potentiality of calm and peace, thus in this way communism was dilluted by the capitalist powers at all sores. let's now think that in the ways the communism drafted it's potentiality, specially after Chinese centralism raised to power after the equal global trade menifetos and it was successful to set up it's ultimate cores, it was time for Russia to justify that communist like ideology is not the only way to response the terror itself, in this way when the concept of the manicure trade through market socialism had succeeded and the deadlock diplomacy had been abbandoned by Russia and China, we seek out that it finally happened that they both joined hands after 2012 itself. AT this core of all centrality, we shall see now that Russia is trying to justify that capitalism is going to hurt the centralism of the nation-states themselves, we have witnesssed what happened to ukraine, now Russia is only interested in the delicacy to destroy the powers in Syria in the shape of (Islamic State) because it thinks that it would be able to succeed to wash out the idea of terror, which was once opposed on to it and thus Russia had to be careful to not make it airborn again, because may be in 1962 Soviet Russia was able to stop the disaster in the face of war, but this time it is going to be much tough to control to resist the temptation of the 3rd world war on the verge to succeed the temptation of counter-insurgency itself, so russia has to understand it's role in control and distruction itsel.f T The douts will certainly be tried to contain with past joints, specific to the task, the Americans are already at the core in Syria to understand that how media is giving more preference to the task done by Russia, because we all know that both sides are show casing powers, they have no interests in defusing or switching off the calamity face by central Asian nations- in this case Russia will have to at what it did in the day of the cold war otherwise there are all possibilties of distruction and it will be no longer in it's control, once Russia looses the grip as well...

turkey- the pig for slaughter

It is recent vision of politics entertaining the mask hoods of the terror's security that Turkey has gone through severe stress and disturbance in it's own zone of the security- either from bomb blasts by the outer terrorist, or from track down of it's air planes by russia; it is either by the distructions in it's international headquarters or it is in the trade disturbance in the sea by the outer forces, Turkey has been rampaged like Rabbits by Hawks in the politics of global erina and has been sent to leave it's sufficience in histarics. However, Turkey has been a massive centre of the people emmigrating from Syria, Iraq and other places where terrorist activities are taking place in hords of galloping thunder, we are witnessing, it is not being only taunted by the European power for not controlling emmigrents to it'shome, but it's own political authority is also under hsade of black horizon with the discursion from outside occuring in it's borders. It has long since dealed by political scholars and historians that Turkish waters, specially the Constantinople's straight connect to the rich straight resources, which are visioned by Russians as treasury of their own self, but is this resource hunger enough to call Turks braggarts behind their backs, when they are helping this world the most to avoid any chance of political dismouncy through securing their people? isn't a counter insurgency for those, who are doing that? they shal surely realise how dangerous it is to unhealth the position of the Turkey at the moment, or they are waiting to loose their final enterport? IN this way, thus we shall have to think that what European powers doing as it is also being put forward by the central scholars that France has acted against European dominance rather than helping people to re-cognate forthe terrorism itself, we hope that we shall not witness the 3rd world war, because if it the situation goes the same, we are going to witness it and this time the cause will be 'self-responsibilty for credits of security' which is no where in the scene, either we talks of bombardment in Syria by Russians or counter defence by the European powers on the clock at the present....