aura authority and americans

The United States has gone through several deficiencies, credits and interfaces since it has become the world power after the downfall of the Soviet union, however it has been blown out by it's hiddden counter-parts including China, Combodia, North Korea, Cuba and Vietnam as well, in this course of the time, American authorities has discussed their chances, role and demonstrate their own wages to exclude certain asspects from the political authority as well, but it continue to hold on to it's aura itself. However, Americans are living in the suspect of being reporting to help the Islamic State under the war going on in Syria now, because the historic facts are not in their support as it is believed by some communicative agencies that Bashad Al Asad has been wished to be thwarded by the Americans due to the capacity of the past and his father was wished to be done the same, Americans wished this politics to remain at the possible mechanism itself- in such way what we shall have to understand is that whether Americans expecting that they will loss their own reputation in the world is something- however in this face of time, was there any global reputation americans have in the past? that's the identity question for itself- when we say that Americans have dominations, we forget to remember that America has never been it's own self and it's emmigrent citizens has never wished for it's own identity itself- However in the face of the development of the politics and identity, second of all, we shall have to remember that the power the American politicians have at present in two zones includng NATO and CENTO itself at both shores itself. The point is that when we are saying that United States has been involved to distress Syria in the war and is trying to dimulge the political government in Syria, we shall have to think out that Americans always like to react late, the world wars and the gulf war is the eye witness, why shall it wish to act on the first note itself? in the same way, we shall have to understand that when they are saying that Americans hadn't been able to captive the islamic state's leader Bagdadi and helped in the formation of the new terror in the world, it doesn't mean that America is a nation that supports terror forever, otherwise it has released all it's prison and it won't be whirling with it's possible wish to give security to the world. What is the fact is that we are not expecting to have the 3rd world war, we know that even the United States hasn't been hegemonic in last few years, it has tried to support actual demonstration of balance of power, it is no dout that what's going on in the nearby teritories of Syria from Turk's distruction of Russian plane and Russian distruction of the Saudi Arab's navy post submarine, this all have to be understood in the face of the equal balance of power, rather than thinking in the mode of distruction, otherwise this realist approach which only talks about the power and distructio will destroy the whole world itself, as this time not only Americans will be responsible but the Asiatic teritories and so it will be responsible from the Russian side itself for the equal existence of distruction itself...